The Federal High
Court, Abuja, on Tuesday heard that a former Chief of Air Staff, Mohammed Umar,
has commenced an out of court settlement in the money laundering charge against
him. Umar is being tried on a seven-count charge bordering on money
laundering of N4.8 billion, while he was Chief of Air Staff. He had pleaded not guilty and was granted bail by Justice Binta Nyako on self-recognition.
laundering of N4.8 billion, while he was Chief of Air Staff. He had pleaded not guilty and was granted bail by Justice Binta Nyako on self-recognition.
At the resumed
hearing on Tuesday, Umar’s Counsel, Hassan Liman (SAN), informed the court of
moves by his client to have the matter settled out of court. Liman said that
his client held meetings with officials of the Economic and Financial Crimes
Commission (EFCC). He said the first meeting, involving the head of legal
department of the commission, the prosecuting counsel and Umar, was held on May
31 while another meeting was held on June 3. He said that in attendance at both
meetings was a member of the EFCC task force, Ibrahim Musa and the prosecution
counsel, Sylvanus Tahir.
He said it was resolved that the defendant should send
a formal communication to the commission. Liman further disclosed that a formal
letter addressed to the Chairman of the EFCC, Mr Ibrahim Magu, dated June 6,
had already been dispatched.
Confirming the development, the prosecuting
counsel said that he was aware that the defendant had written a letter to the
chairman of the commission. He said that in the letter, the defendant was
seeking to engage the Federal Government in a discussion over the charge.
“I
also confirm that there were meetings between the defendant and the commission
where I was also in attendance,’’ Tahir confirmed. Meanwhile, when the matters
was called, the prosecuting counsel said they were ready for the trial, but
Liman said that it would be prejudicial to commence trial. Liman said this was
in view of the ongoing attempt to settle out of court.
He urged the court to
grant an adjournment to enable them proceed with the out of court settlement in
spite of the fact that the matter had been set down for trial.
The prosecuting
counsel, however, insisted that the out of court settlement was not a ground to
stop trial since it was not a civil matter. Tahir urged the court to order for
commencement of trial.
Justice Nyako, however, held that trial could not commence since the condition precedent for trial had not been met by the defence.
Nyako said that the defence ought to have filed a summary of defence for the trial to commence. She adjourned the matter till June 16 for commencement of trial.
